Our Blog

Super “lead-a-mania” Action Figures recalled

January 24, 2012

Did I ever love my plastic toys when I was younger. I played with and carried my action figures around with me all day long. I put them in my pockets and probably dipped them in my cereal bowl at some point. And yes, probably had them in my mouth at some point too. It is terrifying to think of toys covered in lead.

Super Luchamania Action Figures are being recalled due to them containing excessive lead. These figures were sold in packs of 12 and could be purchased at various Mexican Specialty Craft Stores throughout the United States.

If you have any of these toys return them to the Lee Carter Company for a refund or credit.

Toy safety must be a top priority for manufacturers. Our firm has extensive experience in holding those responsible accountable for the defective children’s toys they produce.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Safety Group Seeks Recall of Five Million Jeeps

The Center for Auto Safety is asking Chrysler Group and Fiat to recall about five million vehicles. The safety group also been urging a recall of 1993-2004 Jeep Grand Cherokees since 2009, stating the vehicles have two problems that involving fire hazards when the vehicle is rear-ended. The

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Talk Texting With Your Loved Ones

Besides being a personal injury attorney, I am a runner. I run all over Buffalo and Western New York. What amazes me is the number of people I see texting or talking while driving. I see them jolted into awareness, taking quick action when they bring their eyes

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Fourth Department Holds No Video Allowed For “NPE”

In Flores v. Vescera, (4th Dept. April 2013) the plaintiff appealed from a protective order that denied her demand to videotape a neuropsychological evaluation (NPE). The Curt held that there is no express statutory authority to videotape medical examinations and that videotaping has not been allowed in the

Read Blog