Our Blog

Johnson & Johnson unit ” marketing run amock”?

September 4, 2014

Did Johnson and Johnson’s attempt to convince doctors that metal on metal hip implants were safe amount to “marketing run amok? J&J pushed its pinnacle hip implants, promoting the devices to doctors, plaintiff’s attorney Mark Lanier told jurors yesterday, also that the pinnacle hip implants suffered from design flaws, yet Johnson and Johnson assured doctors they worked “99.9% of the time.”

A large number of patients who had the devices implanted are now having cobalt and chromium material leaching into their bloodstream. J&J is taking the position that the metal in the woman’s ( the plaintiff in the case) body isn’t tied to design flaws, but by the position of the woman’s hips.

You should know that J&J stopped selling the metal on metal hip implant devices in August, 2013 after the FDA indicated it would require device makers to submit new versions of artificial hips for approval. You will likely see news about the artificial hips called Depuy implants.

J and J agreed to put as much as $1 billion and recovery. Medical costs and removal of recalled ASR, hips, the ASR is a different version of hip implant. Many familiar with the orthopedic devices believe J&J did not tell doctors about the failure rate of the devices, instead continued selling them.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Talk Texting With Your Loved Ones

Besides being a personal injury attorney, I am a runner. I run all over Buffalo and Western New York. What amazes me is the number of people I see texting or talking while driving. I see them jolted into awareness, taking quick action when they bring their eyes

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Fourth Department Holds No Video Allowed For “NPE”

In Flores v. Vescera, (4th Dept. April 2013) the plaintiff appealed from a protective order that denied her demand to videotape a neuropsychological evaluation (NPE). The Curt held that there is no express statutory authority to videotape medical examinations and that videotaping has not been allowed in the

Read Blog