Our Blog

Attorney Employment Contracts Must Be Fair

January 11, 2014

As an attorney who practices law involving attorney employment agreements, I have read many cases where the contract is unenforceable because in impinges on the clients’ right to freely chose their counsel. Attorney employment agreements are unenforceable that state that when an attorney leaves a firm and takes firm clients with her, the departing attorney’s portion of the fee will be limited if she informs the firm’s clients she is leaving. In Becker v. Cellino & Barnes the Court held unenforceable a contract that stated that if the departing attorney informed his clients that he was leaving, prior to his departure, he would only be entitle to what amounts to 11% of the overall fee, regardless of the amount of work he did on the file after he left the firm. This was determined to be unenforceable as it limits the clients choice of counsel.

There were other methods/calculations regarding how to divide the fee, but those calculations only came into play if the departing attorney did not herself initiate contact with the clients to inform her clients she were leaving. In the case linked above in which I was the plaintiff, I believe the court was misguided in holding that there were issues of fact regarding those provisions. Regardless of whether those provision were fair or not, the other provisions could only be reached under the contract if the client herself did not initiate contact to tell her clients she was leaving. Further, the law discussed by the court regarding the methods in the employment contract to divide the fees if the attorney did not contact her clients does not pertain to employment agreements, but deals with agreements that are made between two firms at the time of substitution of one firm to another, such as in a referal situation or when one firm takes a case away from another firm.

If you have any questions regarding an agreement please feel free to contact me directly.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Chrysler recalls 2.7 Million Jeeps

Chrysler is recalling 2.7 million Jeeps because of fires. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says there have been too many deaths from fires when Jeeps are hit from behind. The picture shows the fuel tank exposed below the bumper. In a crash the vehicle can burst into

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

GM Recalls 200,000 SUVs

GM is recalling 200,000 midsize SUVs due to fire hazards in the driver’s side door. Vehicles in the snow belt states, including upstate New York, are more prone to catch fire. The fires start in in the master power door and window module which can short out and

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Rear End Crash Denied Summary Judgment

In Borowski v. Ptak, (4th Dept. June 2013), a 3-2 decision, the Fourth Department upheld the lower Court’s denial of a summary judgement motion for defendant.

This rear-end crash was a little different than most cases. In this case the Plaintiff was the party that rear-ended the defendant.

Read Blog