Our Blog

Attorney Employment Contracts Must Be Fair

January 11, 2014

As an attorney who practices law involving attorney employment agreements, I have read many cases where the contract is unenforceable because in impinges on the clients’ right to freely chose their counsel. Attorney employment agreements are unenforceable that state that when an attorney leaves a firm and takes firm clients with her, the departing attorney’s portion of the fee will be limited if she informs the firm’s clients she is leaving. In Becker v. Cellino & Barnes the Court held unenforceable a contract that stated that if the departing attorney informed his clients that he was leaving, prior to his departure, he would only be entitle to what amounts to 11% of the overall fee, regardless of the amount of work he did on the file after he left the firm. This was determined to be unenforceable as it limits the clients choice of counsel.

There were other methods/calculations regarding how to divide the fee, but those calculations only came into play if the departing attorney did not herself initiate contact with the clients to inform her clients she were leaving. In the case linked above in which I was the plaintiff, I believe the court was misguided in holding that there were issues of fact regarding those provisions. Regardless of whether those provision were fair or not, the other provisions could only be reached under the contract if the client herself did not initiate contact to tell her clients she was leaving. Further, the law discussed by the court regarding the methods in the employment contract to divide the fees if the attorney did not contact her clients does not pertain to employment agreements, but deals with agreements that are made between two firms at the time of substitution of one firm to another, such as in a referal situation or when one firm takes a case away from another firm.

If you have any questions regarding an agreement please feel free to contact me directly.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Fall Was The Result Of Elevated Related Risk

In, NICOMETI v. THE VINEYARDS OF FREDONIA, LLC (June 2013) the Fourth Department held that contrary to the contention of defendants, the Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff’s fall was the result of an elevation-related risk for which Labor Law § 240 (1) provides protection.

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Sovereign Immunity Grounds Do Not Always Apply

In Sue/Perior Concrete & Paving v. Lewiston Golf Course Corporation, (4th Dept. 2013) the court held that “The central question on this appeal is whether defendant Lewiston Golf Course Corporation (LGCC), a corporation formed under the laws of the Seneca Nation of Indians (Nation or SNI), is protected

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Jeep Strollers causing injury prompting recall

Jeep vehicles aren’t the only thing being recalled bearing the “Jeep” name. Kolcraft is recalling Jeep Liberty Strollers. These strollers look rough and tumble and provide your little one with a comfy looking ride complete with toy steering wheel, key, and gear shifter. However, they are causing injuries

Read Blog