Our Blog

New Trucking Safety Rule Should Protect Users Of The Roads

January 23, 2014

Today, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) released a final rule allowing the agency to suspend or revoke the operating authority of for-hire motor carriers. Here is the rule: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/01/22/2014-01174/patterns-of-safety-violations-by-motor-carrier-management As truck accident attorney, I am hopefull the most dangerous violators can be dealt with more quickly.

FMCSA intends to apply the rule in the most egregious cases where the motor carrier has committed a pattern of unsafe practices. Under the rule, if FMCSA suspects that an officer of a bus or truck company has demonstrated a pattern of avoiding regulatory compliance or ignoring civil penalties for safety violations, the agency would investigate that carrier’s management structure and operations to determine if it is deliberately concealing safety violations. If a pattern of unsafe practices is found, FMCSA would suspend or revoke the company’s authority to operate.

The new rule includes a trucking company’s failure to:

  1. Comply with statutory or regulatory safety requirements
  2. Comply with FMCSA, state, or local orders intended to redress violations of federal regulatory safety requirements
  3. Pay civil penalties for violations of regulatory safety requirements
  4. Respond to enforcement actions arising out of violations of regulatory safety requirements.

The rule addresses the problem of those who attempt to avoid regulatory compliance or mask noncompliance by submitting new applications for registration, often under a different name, to continue operations after being placed out of service. Lets get the bad operators off the road.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Fall Was The Result Of Elevated Related Risk

In, NICOMETI v. THE VINEYARDS OF FREDONIA, LLC (June 2013) the Fourth Department held that contrary to the contention of defendants, the Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff’s fall was the result of an elevation-related risk for which Labor Law § 240 (1) provides protection.

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Sovereign Immunity Grounds Do Not Always Apply

In Sue/Perior Concrete & Paving v. Lewiston Golf Course Corporation, (4th Dept. 2013) the court held that “The central question on this appeal is whether defendant Lewiston Golf Course Corporation (LGCC), a corporation formed under the laws of the Seneca Nation of Indians (Nation or SNI), is protected

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Jeep Strollers causing injury prompting recall

Jeep vehicles aren’t the only thing being recalled bearing the “Jeep” name. Kolcraft is recalling Jeep Liberty Strollers. These strollers look rough and tumble and provide your little one with a comfy looking ride complete with toy steering wheel, key, and gear shifter. However, they are causing injuries

Read Blog