Our Blog

Traumatic Brain Injury Trial Witnesses Are Vital

January 22, 2013

In most brain injury cases the survivor looks and acts normal, or at least is perceived this way by the jury in the courtroom. Since this can often be an “invisible injury” there is a need for “before and after” witnesses. These witnesses who have known the survivor both before and after the injury can explain how the victim is now a different person. In such cases witnesses can include coworkers, family members, and friends. The supervisor can make a very effective witness. She can offer examples of how the survivor has changed and what conditions in his or her workplace have been adversely impacted.

Oftentimes a family doctor who has treated the patient for years prior to the injury can best explain their observations of the level of cognition and ability of the survivor. These witnesses will be able to testify as to changes in short-term memory, attention and concentration, ability to multitask, mood changes, headaches and other disturbances. The use of concrete examples will be most effective.

The use of demonstrative evidence can also be helpful in brain injury litigation. These include the use of MRIs and diagrams of surgical procedures which will help correlate injuries with the traumatic event. This is even more important for cases with less severe brain injuries where the defense will try to deny the injury altogether.

At Feroleto Law we have experience handling brain injury cases. We can assist in the proper preparation of your case and provide the foundation needed to bring a successful claim. Please call the attorneys at Feroleto Law so we can assist you today.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Amusement Park Must Keep Patrons Safe

As an attorney who has handled many amusement park injury cases against parks like Six Flags and others, I am concerned when employees continue to fail to keep their patrons safe. An employee of the park knows the ride better than the customers and it is that persons

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Fall Was The Result Of Elevated Related Risk

In, NICOMETI v. THE VINEYARDS OF FREDONIA, LLC (June 2013) the Fourth Department held that contrary to the contention of defendants, the Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff’s fall was the result of an elevation-related risk for which Labor Law § 240 (1) provides protection.

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Sovereign Immunity Grounds Do Not Always Apply

In Sue/Perior Concrete & Paving v. Lewiston Golf Course Corporation, (4th Dept. 2013) the court held that “The central question on this appeal is whether defendant Lewiston Golf Course Corporation (LGCC), a corporation formed under the laws of the Seneca Nation of Indians (Nation or SNI), is protected

Read Blog