Our Blog

Super “lead-a-mania” Action Figures recalled

January 24, 2012

Did I ever love my plastic toys when I was younger. I played with and carried my action figures around with me all day long. I put them in my pockets and probably dipped them in my cereal bowl at some point. And yes, probably had them in my mouth at some point too. It is terrifying to think of toys covered in lead.

Super Luchamania Action Figures are being recalled due to them containing excessive lead. These figures were sold in packs of 12 and could be purchased at various Mexican Specialty Craft Stores throughout the United States.

If you have any of these toys return them to the Lee Carter Company for a refund or credit.

Toy safety must be a top priority for manufacturers. Our firm has extensive experience in holding those responsible accountable for the defective children’s toys they produce.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Amusement Park Must Keep Patrons Safe

As an attorney who has handled many amusement park injury cases against parks like Six Flags and others, I am concerned when employees continue to fail to keep their patrons safe. An employee of the park knows the ride better than the customers and it is that persons

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Fall Was The Result Of Elevated Related Risk

In, NICOMETI v. THE VINEYARDS OF FREDONIA, LLC (June 2013) the Fourth Department held that contrary to the contention of defendants, the Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff’s fall was the result of an elevation-related risk for which Labor Law § 240 (1) provides protection.

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Sovereign Immunity Grounds Do Not Always Apply

In Sue/Perior Concrete & Paving v. Lewiston Golf Course Corporation, (4th Dept. 2013) the court held that “The central question on this appeal is whether defendant Lewiston Golf Course Corporation (LGCC), a corporation formed under the laws of the Seneca Nation of Indians (Nation or SNI), is protected

Read Blog