Our Blog

Super “lead-a-mania” Action Figures recalled

January 24, 2012

Did I ever love my plastic toys when I was younger. I played with and carried my action figures around with me all day long. I put them in my pockets and probably dipped them in my cereal bowl at some point. And yes, probably had them in my mouth at some point too. It is terrifying to think of toys covered in lead.

Super Luchamania Action Figures are being recalled due to them containing excessive lead. These figures were sold in packs of 12 and could be purchased at various Mexican Specialty Craft Stores throughout the United States.

If you have any of these toys return them to the Lee Carter Company for a refund or credit.

Toy safety must be a top priority for manufacturers. Our firm has extensive experience in holding those responsible accountable for the defective children’s toys they produce.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Supplements full of fibs

Supplements full of fibs

As consumers we trust the corporations producing our foods, vitamins, and supplements. It should be enough to read a label to know what is contained within a container. As personal injury attorneys in Buffalo, NY and as consumers we are extremely concerned about the mislabeling of food and

Read Blog
Carbon Monoxide and generator winter safety

Carbon Monoxide and generator winter safety

As we have seen here in Buffalo, NY and elsewhere in the U.S. this winter, winter storms can cause power outages. Power outages are dangerous especially when the temperature dips below freezing. The elderly and infants are especially susceptible to cold related injuries.

Read Blog
Automatic Emergency Braking in Heavy Trucks: A Major Step Towards Safer Roads

No-Fault Providers Need Not Bill After a Denial

In State Farm v. Domotor 266 A.D.2d 219 (2nd Dept. 1999) the court held that after the no-fault carrier issues a denial of payment there is no need for the medical provider to send bills to the carrier. After the denial the provider can later litigate or arbitrate

Read Blog