Our Blog

Speeder Who Struck Construction Worker Jailed

March 14, 2013

As an injury attorney representing many construction workers I am very familiar with construction site accidents, and violations of safety regulations governing scaffolds, trenches, work surfaces, fall protection, etc.

Some of the safety standards are not easily recognizable, such as the angle of the grade used for a working surface, however, some are easily understandable. One is speeding in a construction zone. An upstate man was sentenced to jail this week for killing a construction worker at a road construction site.

Speeding in School or Construction Zone

If one violates 1180C, 1180D2, or 1180F of the New York Vehicle and Traffic Law the fines vary based on speed and are:

  • Not more that 10mph over- $90-$300 + Surcharge
  • Between 11 – 30mph over- $180-$600 + Surcharge (and/or imprisonment up to 15 days)
  • More than 30mph over – $360-$1,200 + Surcharge (and/or imprisonment up to 30 days)

Please, slow down in construction zones. You wouldn’t want a loved one hurt while doing his or her job because a driver wouldn’t slow down.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Amusement Park Must Keep Patrons Safe

As an attorney who has handled many amusement park injury cases against parks like Six Flags and others, I am concerned when employees continue to fail to keep their patrons safe. An employee of the park knows the ride better than the customers and it is that persons

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Fall Was The Result Of Elevated Related Risk

In, NICOMETI v. THE VINEYARDS OF FREDONIA, LLC (June 2013) the Fourth Department held that contrary to the contention of defendants, the Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff’s fall was the result of an elevation-related risk for which Labor Law § 240 (1) provides protection.

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Sovereign Immunity Grounds Do Not Always Apply

In Sue/Perior Concrete & Paving v. Lewiston Golf Course Corporation, (4th Dept. 2013) the court held that “The central question on this appeal is whether defendant Lewiston Golf Course Corporation (LGCC), a corporation formed under the laws of the Seneca Nation of Indians (Nation or SNI), is protected

Read Blog