Our Blog

Reminder Concerning Supplementary Uninsured Motorist Protection

October 23, 2012

Although we have discussed this in the past regarding car crashes, as a Western New York personal injury attorney I believe there can never be enough reminders regarding Supplementary Uninsured Motorist insurance coverage (SUM). If you’re in a car crash and the person that crashes into you does not have enough insurance to cover your injuries, you can look to your own insurance if you have the proper coverage (SUM). The additional coverage to provide the necessary protection for you and your family is really just a few dollars more per year.

In New York State other drivers can carry as little as $25,000 of insurance “liability coverage.” The liability coverage amount is the maximum amount that the insurance company for the car that crashes into you will have to pay if you are injured. However to protect yourself and your family you can purchase insurance for this situation. For example, if the person that crashes into you has only $25,000 in coverage and you have $100,000 in SUM coverage (which you purchase from your own insurance company) you can look to your own policy for the difference between the two coverages, i.e., $75,000. This additional coverage costs only a few dollars more year. Often insurance salespeople will not inform you of this coverage. You must purchase liability coverage (the amount that covers you if you cause a crash) equal to the amount of SUM coverage you desire.

I encourage everyone to at least ask their insurance company about this. It is a very simple and inexpensive piece of mind.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Amusement Park Must Keep Patrons Safe

As an attorney who has handled many amusement park injury cases against parks like Six Flags and others, I am concerned when employees continue to fail to keep their patrons safe. An employee of the park knows the ride better than the customers and it is that persons

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Fall Was The Result Of Elevated Related Risk

In, NICOMETI v. THE VINEYARDS OF FREDONIA, LLC (June 2013) the Fourth Department held that contrary to the contention of defendants, the Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff’s fall was the result of an elevation-related risk for which Labor Law § 240 (1) provides protection.

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Sovereign Immunity Grounds Do Not Always Apply

In Sue/Perior Concrete & Paving v. Lewiston Golf Course Corporation, (4th Dept. 2013) the court held that “The central question on this appeal is whether defendant Lewiston Golf Course Corporation (LGCC), a corporation formed under the laws of the Seneca Nation of Indians (Nation or SNI), is protected

Read Blog