Our Blog

No Need For Provider To Continue Sending Bills After No-Fault Denial

February 22, 2013

In New York Hosp. v. Country-Wide, it was held that after the carrier denies a no-fault claim because the carrier’s doctor claims that no further care is needed, a provider need not continue sending in bills to later establish a claim for payment. In other words, the carrier cannot later deny payment for failure to submit medical proofs of claim after the denial.

In Matter of Geico Ins Co. AAA Case No. 410201141253, the court held that the carrier asserting a violation of the fee schedule is precluded when not raised in a timely denial of claim.

If you are an attorney or medical provider and are having difficulty obtaining payment for services provided to your client we can help you with such matters. Please contact our firm for more information.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Rear End Crash Denied Summary Judgment

In Borowski v. Ptak, (4th Dept. June 2013), a 3-2 decision, the Fourth Department upheld the lower Court’s denial of a summary judgement motion for defendant.

This rear-end crash was a little different than most cases. In this case the Plaintiff was the party that rear-ended the defendant.

Read Blog