Our Blog

Pool Slide Causes Several Serious Injuries

May 10, 2012

As a personal injury attorney I see way too many instances of people getting hurt using products because the products are simply not safe. This recall really shocked and frightened me and I urge you all to be aware of the dangers this slide poses. It looks super fun, right? Unfortunately, serious injuries have been reported, including a young mother dying. Because the slide looses air, leaving no cushion, the woman’s head hit the concrete at the pool’s edge. She fractured her neck and died. Another man is now a quadriplegic because of this slide.

These slides were sold at Wal-Mart and Toys R Us between January 2005 and June 2009. If you own or think you may own one of these slides please go to this link and follow the instructions.

It is this authors opinion that manufacturers must be held accountable for putting unsafe products on the market, especially when they cause injuries. As consumers we should be able to assume that a product is safe to use. Sadly, that is not the case.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Amusement Park Must Keep Patrons Safe

As an attorney who has handled many amusement park injury cases against parks like Six Flags and others, I am concerned when employees continue to fail to keep their patrons safe. An employee of the park knows the ride better than the customers and it is that persons

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Fall Was The Result Of Elevated Related Risk

In, NICOMETI v. THE VINEYARDS OF FREDONIA, LLC (June 2013) the Fourth Department held that contrary to the contention of defendants, the Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff’s fall was the result of an elevation-related risk for which Labor Law § 240 (1) provides protection.

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Sovereign Immunity Grounds Do Not Always Apply

In Sue/Perior Concrete & Paving v. Lewiston Golf Course Corporation, (4th Dept. 2013) the court held that “The central question on this appeal is whether defendant Lewiston Golf Course Corporation (LGCC), a corporation formed under the laws of the Seneca Nation of Indians (Nation or SNI), is protected

Read Blog