Our Blog

NYS Scaffold Law Must Remain Law

February 6, 2013

New York’s Scaffold is continuously under attack and much misinformation exists about it. In short, the scaffold law protects workers who work at heights. Today, attorney John Feroleto was a guest on The Capitol Pressroom to discuss this law and why it is important. The interview can be heard by clicking on the link above and choosing the February 6, 2013 broadcast and skipping to the 23:24 minute mark.

Those in opposition to the law often are very vocal in claiming that repealing the law would dramatically increase jobs. To make this point, opponents refer to Illinois and what occurred after that state repealed their Scaffold Law.

Here are the statistics: Illinois repealed their Scaffold Law (a law that protects workers) in 1995. From 1996 – 2001 construction employment in Illinois increased 21.0%. However, in that same time period, construction employment in New York increased by 29.6%, with the law in place.

Even in an economic down turn, from 2005 – 2010 construction employment declined only by 6.1% in New York compared to 26.0% in Illinois showing that even with this law, New York State fared better.

There is no reason for this law to be repealed. As personal injury attorneys in Buffalo, NY we understand that working at heights is dangerous and can be deadly. Worker’s safety should never play second chair to profit.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Amusement Park Must Keep Patrons Safe

As an attorney who has handled many amusement park injury cases against parks like Six Flags and others, I am concerned when employees continue to fail to keep their patrons safe. An employee of the park knows the ride better than the customers and it is that persons

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Fall Was The Result Of Elevated Related Risk

In, NICOMETI v. THE VINEYARDS OF FREDONIA, LLC (June 2013) the Fourth Department held that contrary to the contention of defendants, the Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff’s fall was the result of an elevation-related risk for which Labor Law § 240 (1) provides protection.

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Sovereign Immunity Grounds Do Not Always Apply

In Sue/Perior Concrete & Paving v. Lewiston Golf Course Corporation, (4th Dept. 2013) the court held that “The central question on this appeal is whether defendant Lewiston Golf Course Corporation (LGCC), a corporation formed under the laws of the Seneca Nation of Indians (Nation or SNI), is protected

Read Blog