Our Blog

Jury awards punitive damages against manufacturer of surgical mesh

August 19, 2013

The jury in the first federal trial involving transvaginal mesh returned a verdict of $2 million Thursday. The woman brought suit against C R Bard, Inc., alleging the manufacturer failed to warn about product defects which caused injuries, including bleeding and pain requiring her to undergo two surgeries to remove the mesh.

The product is surgically inserted into a woman to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) a fairly common condition in women after childbirth and in older women. Critics say the surgery can often be performed without implanting mesh and the mesh is prone to complications and can erode. It is often difficult to remove the because healthy tissue grows through the mesh, thereby integrating it into the woman’s body.

The compensatory damages for personal injuries were $250,000.00 and punitive damages were $1,750,000. In New York State is very difficult to recover punitive damages. There are currently about 20,000 lawsuits pending in multidistrict litigation in Charleston, West Virginia.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

FAA seeks new antifatigue rules after Buffalo crash

According to the Buffalo News ” The Federal Aviation Administration will seek to modernize rules governing when and how much pilots can fly after the Feb. 12 crash of Continental Connection Flight 3407 in Clarence raised concerns that the crew might have been fatigued.

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Court Seals Documents at Expense of Consumer Safety

An AAJ article June 4, 2009 looks at the practice of courts sealing litigation documents to the advantage of manufacturers in certain product cases. For example, Bausch & Lomb settled hundreds of cases involving contact solution that involved blindness where the court ordered the documents to be sealed.

Read Blog