Our Blog

Jeep Strollers causing injury prompting recall

June 20, 2013

Jeep vehicles aren’t the only thing being recalled bearing the “Jeep” name. Kolcraft is recalling Jeep Liberty Strollers. These strollers look rough and tumble and provide your little one with a comfy looking ride complete with toy steering wheel, key, and gear shifter. However, they are causing injuries.

The inner tube on some of these stroller models can rupture causing not only the tire rim to fracture, but for the rim to fly off the stroller which then becomes a projectile.

There have been 39 reports of tires rupturing, including 18 reports of injury.

The CPSC is advising, “If your stroller wheels have a gray triangle located on the rim at the valve stem then your stroller wheels are not included in this recall.”

If your stroller is subject to the recall, stop using it and contact the company for replacement tire(s). Please visit the CPSC website for complete recall information and detailed photos.

As a personal injury attorney practicing in Buffalo, New York, I get very upset when I learn about defective children’s products. There is nothing more important than keeping our children safe. Many parents save their money in order to buy high end strollers and other products believing that they are designed with their baby’s safety in mind. Sadly this is often not the case.

Always feel free to call us at Feroleto Law if you have any concerns or questions about injuries your child has sustained because of a dangerous or defective product.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Amusement Park Must Keep Patrons Safe

As an attorney who has handled many amusement park injury cases against parks like Six Flags and others, I am concerned when employees continue to fail to keep their patrons safe. An employee of the park knows the ride better than the customers and it is that persons

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Fall Was The Result Of Elevated Related Risk

In, NICOMETI v. THE VINEYARDS OF FREDONIA, LLC (June 2013) the Fourth Department held that contrary to the contention of defendants, the Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff’s fall was the result of an elevation-related risk for which Labor Law § 240 (1) provides protection.

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Sovereign Immunity Grounds Do Not Always Apply

In Sue/Perior Concrete & Paving v. Lewiston Golf Course Corporation, (4th Dept. 2013) the court held that “The central question on this appeal is whether defendant Lewiston Golf Course Corporation (LGCC), a corporation formed under the laws of the Seneca Nation of Indians (Nation or SNI), is protected

Read Blog