Our Blog

Serious Injury Threshold Motion Does Not Necessarily Require Doctor’s Affirmation.

December 20, 2013

In Feggins v. Fagard, 52 AD 3d 1221 (4th Dept. 2008) the Court held that in response to a threshold motion plaintiff may rely on unsworn reports and uncertified medical records submitted by defendants or simply referenced in the submitted reports of defendant’s examining physicians.

As a practicing personal injury attorney in Buffalo, I would ague that this eliminates the need to obtain an affirmation or affidavit from plaintiff’s medical providers. I would still obtain a doctor’s affirmation or chiropractic affidavit in response to the motion. However, in the right case, relying on simply the meds supplied by opposing counsel where they obviously present issues of fact may be the proper path to follow. Please contact my office if you need assistance representing clients with such matters.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Court of Appeals Rules on SUM Claims

In a decision dated June 4, 2009, In the Matter of Allstate Insurance Company v. Rivera, the Court of Appeals handed down a ruling regarding SUM claims. Essentially the Court ruled that insurers under a SUM policy are “able to reduce the coverage limits of the tortfeasor’s policy

Read Blog