Our Blog

GM Recalls 200,000 SUVs

June 17, 2013

GM is recalling 200,000 midsize SUVs due to fire hazards in the driver’s side door. Vehicles in the snow belt states, including upstate New York, are more prone to catch fire. The fires start in in the master power door and window module which can short out and catch fire.

As an attorney representing people, I see truck accidents and car crashes and also defective product cases. There are many cases which occur due to dangerous products. In one crash, several lawyers said a wheel coming off a truck was a fluke. The driver was very badly injured. We were able to show the truck was prone to rust in the Northeast and in upstate New York. And we were able to show the problem had happened many times before, and continued uncorrected. We helped the man and his family keep their home, get a new start and stay off public assistance.

The GM models are 2006 – 2007 Chevrolet Trailblazer, GMC Envoy, Buick Rainier, Saab 9–7X and Isuzu Ascender. GM will replace the module, it damaged or apply a moisture protection coating if it is not. Be safe.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Amusement Park Must Keep Patrons Safe

As an attorney who has handled many amusement park injury cases against parks like Six Flags and others, I am concerned when employees continue to fail to keep their patrons safe. An employee of the park knows the ride better than the customers and it is that persons

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Fall Was The Result Of Elevated Related Risk

In, NICOMETI v. THE VINEYARDS OF FREDONIA, LLC (June 2013) the Fourth Department held that contrary to the contention of defendants, the Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff’s fall was the result of an elevation-related risk for which Labor Law § 240 (1) provides protection.

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Sovereign Immunity Grounds Do Not Always Apply

In Sue/Perior Concrete & Paving v. Lewiston Golf Course Corporation, (4th Dept. 2013) the court held that “The central question on this appeal is whether defendant Lewiston Golf Course Corporation (LGCC), a corporation formed under the laws of the Seneca Nation of Indians (Nation or SNI), is protected

Read Blog