Our Blog

Fourth Department Upholds §241(6) Labor Law Claim

April 29, 2013

As an experienced Labor Law injury attorney in Western New York and Buffalo, I continue to see injured construction and other type of workers despite laws put in place for their protection. In Smith v. Nestle Purina Petcare Co., (4th Dept. 2013) the Appellate Division upheld the plaintiff’s claim of a violation of Labor Law §241(6). The plaintiff slipped and fell while working on a construction project inside a grain silo owned by the defendant. Plaintiff was standing on a ladder while vacuuming grain dust off the top of a hose rack. He stepped off the ladder, onto accumulated grain dust and a hose that was hanging off the rack, when he twisted his ankle and fell.

The Court held that 12 NYCRR 23-1.7(e)(2) provides that “the parts of the floor…where persons work or pass shall be kept free…from scattered tools and materials…insofar as may be consistent with the work being performed. The Court held that there is an issue of fact as to whether the hose constituted a scattered tool that was a tripping hazard within the meaning of 12 NYCRR(e)(2).

At Feroleto Law we have successfully handled many Labor Law cases while representing workers who have been seriously injured due to violations of laws designed for worker’s safety. Please contact us today if you have been injured due to the negligence of others.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

GM Recalls 200,000 SUVs

GM is recalling 200,000 midsize SUVs due to fire hazards in the driver’s side door. Vehicles in the snow belt states, including upstate New York, are more prone to catch fire. The fires start in in the master power door and window module which can short out and

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Rear End Crash Denied Summary Judgment

In Borowski v. Ptak, (4th Dept. June 2013), a 3-2 decision, the Fourth Department upheld the lower Court’s denial of a summary judgement motion for defendant.

This rear-end crash was a little different than most cases. In this case the Plaintiff was the party that rear-ended the defendant.

Read Blog