Our Blog

Fourth Department Denies Dismissal of Ski Lift Case

January 24, 2014

In Tone v. Song Mountain Ski Center (Fourth Department January 2014), the appellate court reversed the trial court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s personal injury action for injuries caused while on a ski lift. The plaintiff sustained injuries while using a triple chair left at defendant’s facility. Defendant claimed that plaintiff assumed the risk of her injuries in utilizing the ski facility when she “willingly engaged in the recreational activity of downhill skiing.”

Defendant submitted evidence that plaintiff, an experienced skier, was riding the triple chairlift with her eight-year-old son and another passenger. Upon reaching the sign directing passengers to prepare to unload, plaintiff noticed that her skis were entangled with her son’s skis. Defendant did not slow or stop the chairlift, and plaintiff was unable to unload from the chairlift before it passed the unloading area. Plaintiff was injured when she either jumped or was thrown from the chairlift before it reached the safety gate that would have stopped the chairlift.

The court held that “There is undoubtedly some risk of injury inherent in entering, riding and exiting from a chairlift at a ski resort. However, . . . the latter is not of such magnitude as to eliminate all duty of care and thereby insulate the owner from claims of negligent supervision and training of the lift operator or negligent maintenance and operation of the lift itself since such negligence may unduly enhance the level of the risk assumed”

The court overturned the dismissal holding that “Defendant submitted evidence that top chairlift operators are required to monitor every approach to the unloading area to ensure that skiers are unloading safely. According to defendant’s submissions, the top chairlift operators are able to see three to four approaching chairs at any given time, and are able to see to the tower where plaintiff first noticed that her skis were entangled. Once the emergency stop is activated, the chairlift is able to stop within 10 to 12 feet. Based on that evidence, we conclude that there is a triable issue of fact whether defendant was negligent in operating the chairlift.”

Sometimes the negligence of others is not as easily identified as in a car crash or slip and fall. We have experience litigating different types of cases that involve more complex situations. Please call us at Feroleto Law if you have been injured due to the negligence of others or need assistance with your case.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Dealing with no-fault carriers is a constant battle

Are the insurance companies for your no-fault cases hurting your business because they will not pay for the necessary and valuable services that you provide to your patients? I can assist you in this area. As an attorney in Buffalo having represented clients in no-fault cases for many

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Bugaboo Strollers Recalled Due To Fall And Choking Hazard

As a Buffalo and Western New York injury attorney who represents people who are injured using products, I am especially concerned when children become involved. Recently the Consumer Product Safety Commission and Target stores issued a recall for the Bugaboo Cameleon and Bugaboo Donkey Model Strollers with detachable

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Law Firm Employment Agreements And Ethical Issues

As a New York attorney who has dealt with cases involving employment agreements between law firms and their partners/associates I often find that many times these agreements will contain provisions that do not stand up to the ethical code. Employment agreements which limit a client’s right to choose

Read Blog