Our Blog

Employment Contracts Must Not Create Financial Disincentives

August 7, 2013

Often times law firm employment contracts will set forth the amount of the fee the departing attorney is entitled to should current clients go with a departing attorney when she leaves. The amount can never be contingent upon whether or not she informed her clients that she is leaving. She has an ethical obligation to do so. There is much case law regarding this matter. The case law comes from many different jurisdictions.

Generally speaking those agreements which are made at the time of the departure and which entitle the departing attorney to less than 50% of the overall fee, regardless of the model work done on the file after she leaves, are questionable. This is not to say that law firms do not have an interest in protecting their efforts to originally obtain the files, but those calculations must be fair. Generally speaking once the 50% barrier is reached many courts have began to question whether or not there is a financial disincentive to the attorney to continue to represent those clients who wish to go with her.

In our firm we have dealt with these matters in a successful fashion. If you are either an employer or an attorney who has departed a law firm please contact us with any questions you may have. We would also be happy to represent you in this area. Although contracts can never make a fee contingent upon hiding the fact that you’re leaving, there are ways to fairly protect your interests.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Dynocraft Toys “R” Us Bicycles Recalled

As a Buffalo and Western New York injury attorney I am always concerned when products are sold in the community that are harmful to children. These bikes were sold only at Toys “R” Us. The front wheel can become detached while riding. This recall involves 20 inch Avigo

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Lawyers- Which State’s Laws apply?

July 11, the New York Fourth Department Appellate Division Court ruled a lawsuit in Lankenau v Boles (CA 13-01300), on a conflict of laws involving a tractor-trailer crash involving New York driver defendants. The question of whether New York’s common law seat belt rule applies to an accident

Read Blog