Our Blog

Court Seals Documents at Expense of Consumer Safety

June 15, 2009

An AAJ article June 4, 2009 looks at the practice of courts sealing litigation documents to the advantage of manufacturers in certain product cases. For example, Bausch & Lomb settled hundreds of cases involving contact solution that involved blindness where the court ordered the documents to be sealed. This essentially leaves the users of the product and their doctors without any knowledge of the causes of the infection caused by the solution.

The AAJ reported that the practice was the subject of a hearing before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law last week. The practice prevents the public from finding out about harmful products. The article discusses how corporations use secrecy such as this to avoid responsibility and public scrutiny.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Supplements full of fibs

Supplements full of fibs

As consumers we trust the corporations producing our foods, vitamins, and supplements. It should be enough to read a label to know what is contained within a container. As personal injury attorneys in Buffalo, NY and as consumers we are extremely concerned about the mislabeling of food and

Read Blog
Carbon Monoxide and generator winter safety

Carbon Monoxide and generator winter safety

As we have seen here in Buffalo, NY and elsewhere in the U.S. this winter, winter storms can cause power outages. Power outages are dangerous especially when the temperature dips below freezing. The elderly and infants are especially susceptible to cold related injuries.

Read Blog
Automatic Emergency Braking in Heavy Trucks: A Major Step Towards Safer Roads

No-Fault Providers Need Not Bill After a Denial

In State Farm v. Domotor 266 A.D.2d 219 (2nd Dept. 1999) the court held that after the no-fault carrier issues a denial of payment there is no need for the medical provider to send bills to the carrier. After the denial the provider can later litigate or arbitrate

Read Blog