Our Blog

Chrysler recalls 2.7 Million Jeeps

June 18, 2013

Chrysler is recalling 2.7 million Jeeps because of fires. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says there have been too many deaths from fires when Jeeps are hit from behind. The picture shows the fuel tank exposed below the bumper. In a crash the vehicle can burst into flames. The defect is easily correctable.

Those to be recalled are the 1993 – 2004 Jeep grand Cherokee and the 2002 – 2007 Jeep liberty SUVs. Chrysler has been adamant in refusing the recall, however, the NHTSA threatened to have public hearings if Chrysler continued to refuse.

The Center for Auto Safety suggested three modest changes would reduce the risk of fuel leaks and fires in accidents:

  • Install a steel skid plate on 90% of the Jeeps that did not have them
  • Install a longer fuel-filler hose to prevent them from pulling off the tank easily in an impact
  • Install better check valves in the tanks to keep fuel vapor from leaking.

As an injury attorney I am often aware of dangerous defects well before they are widely recognized or in or in the national media.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Amusement Park Must Keep Patrons Safe

As an attorney who has handled many amusement park injury cases against parks like Six Flags and others, I am concerned when employees continue to fail to keep their patrons safe. An employee of the park knows the ride better than the customers and it is that persons

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Fall Was The Result Of Elevated Related Risk

In, NICOMETI v. THE VINEYARDS OF FREDONIA, LLC (June 2013) the Fourth Department held that contrary to the contention of defendants, the Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff’s fall was the result of an elevation-related risk for which Labor Law § 240 (1) provides protection.

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Sovereign Immunity Grounds Do Not Always Apply

In Sue/Perior Concrete & Paving v. Lewiston Golf Course Corporation, (4th Dept. 2013) the court held that “The central question on this appeal is whether defendant Lewiston Golf Course Corporation (LGCC), a corporation formed under the laws of the Seneca Nation of Indians (Nation or SNI), is protected

Read Blog