Our Blog

Big trucker opposition expected to 45% New York Thruway truck toll increase

August 16, 2012

The New York State Thruway Authority wants to raise $90 million per year by raising truck tolls. The hike would increase the toll for a three axle truck traveling between Buffalo and New York City from $88-$127 per trip. Wow. Today they’re having a hearing at the Buffalo and Erie County Library, across from my office. The Authority will have substantial opposition.

The authority claims trucks cause 10,000 times the wear and tear of passenger vehicles. Not sure how they came up with that statistic. Many smaller trucking companies and owner operators are feeling the pinch already. We usually write about safety issues; if somehow an increase would improve road safety both for truckers and other Thruway users, we would be for it.

The Thruway Authority has big management and overhead. It should reduce it’s the management expense and put more construction workers on-the job repairing the roads. Tolls for trucks were already raised 35% and 2005 and 5% in 2009 and in 2010.

Raising the toll for truckers will force some to take alternative routes causing the authority to lose income and currently receives and causing reduce spending by truckers along Thruway. The authority has been raising money and not putting it back into road work for far too long.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Amusement Park Must Keep Patrons Safe

As an attorney who has handled many amusement park injury cases against parks like Six Flags and others, I am concerned when employees continue to fail to keep their patrons safe. An employee of the park knows the ride better than the customers and it is that persons

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Fall Was The Result Of Elevated Related Risk

In, NICOMETI v. THE VINEYARDS OF FREDONIA, LLC (June 2013) the Fourth Department held that contrary to the contention of defendants, the Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff’s fall was the result of an elevation-related risk for which Labor Law § 240 (1) provides protection.

Read Blog
Ohio Court Finds Employment Agreement Unenforceable That Requires Attorney to Return 95% of Fees

Sovereign Immunity Grounds Do Not Always Apply

In Sue/Perior Concrete & Paving v. Lewiston Golf Course Corporation, (4th Dept. 2013) the court held that “The central question on this appeal is whether defendant Lewiston Golf Course Corporation (LGCC), a corporation formed under the laws of the Seneca Nation of Indians (Nation or SNI), is protected

Read Blog