Our Blog

CPSC Issues Recall Due To Choking Hazard

March 18, 2013

As a Buffalo and Western New York injury attorney who represents people who have been injured when using products, I am continually amazed that products reach the marketplace without proper testing and research.

The CPSC recently announced a recall aimed at an unsafe product that can cause harm to children. On March 13, 2012 Toys R US recalled the Imaginarium Activity Walker due to a choking hazard. The CPSC website states that:

“The small bolt and spacer that attaches each front wheel to the walker can detach, posing a choking hazard to young children.”

Consumers can contact Toys R Us at (800) 869-7787 from 9 a.m. to 11 p.m. ET Monday through Saturday and from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. Sunday, or visit the firm’s website at www.toysrus.com and click on Safety Information and Recalls for more information.

Request Your Free Consultation

Get the answers and support you need. Our friendly and experienced Buffalo personal injury lawyers will take the time to understand your case, explain your options, and guide you every step of the way.

Our Practice Areas

Read More Articles

Supplements full of fibs

Supplements full of fibs

As consumers we trust the corporations producing our foods, vitamins, and supplements. It should be enough to read a label to know what is contained within a container. As personal injury attorneys in Buffalo, NY and as consumers we are extremely concerned about the mislabeling of food and

Read Blog
Carbon Monoxide and generator winter safety

Carbon Monoxide and generator winter safety

As we have seen here in Buffalo, NY and elsewhere in the U.S. this winter, winter storms can cause power outages. Power outages are dangerous especially when the temperature dips below freezing. The elderly and infants are especially susceptible to cold related injuries.

Read Blog
Automatic Emergency Braking in Heavy Trucks: A Major Step Towards Safer Roads

No-Fault Providers Need Not Bill After a Denial

In State Farm v. Domotor 266 A.D.2d 219 (2nd Dept. 1999) the court held that after the no-fault carrier issues a denial of payment there is no need for the medical provider to send bills to the carrier. After the denial the provider can later litigate or arbitrate

Read Blog